Does Obama want control of the internet and the say over who you can hire to run your own company IT networks?

Apparently so...The latest power grab. And those liberal clowns were worried about Bush, LOL.





Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to ';direct the national response to the cyber threat'; if necessary for ';the national defense and security.'; The White House is supposed to engage in ';periodic mapping'; of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies ';shall share'; requested information with the federal government. (';Cyber'; is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)





';The language has changed but it doesn't contain any real additional limits,'; EF F's Tine says. ';It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)...The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There's no provision for any administrative process or review. That's where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.';





Translation: If your company is deemed ';critical,'; a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network


http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-103200鈥?/a>Does Obama want control of the internet and the say over who you can hire to run your own company IT networks?
I love it when others have their eyes open, thank you.Does Obama want control of the internet and the say over who you can hire to run your own company IT networks?
A proposal, being worked on behind closed doors, by Sen. Rockefeller of West Virginia would do absolutely that. No if ands or butts. Go to cnet, a spin off of CBS, they have articles on it.
Only a Chinese sympathizer would be against protecting our country from a cyber attack....damn commies are everywhere...mostly within and controlling the Republican Party.
No. There are Republicans behind that idea. No way and no how is Obama involved. No where did your article link say that Obama wants this, and he has much to do. I doubt this bill would be passed by Congress. It has to be passed first where he could veto it.


As for Bush:


HR 8791 and Rex84 took away our Human Rights.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXfXuk6aW鈥?/a>


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzF0W7-1C鈥?/a>


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3e鈥?/a>


Is it a suprise that it is Republicans who introduced this bill?





';When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April';





Just another Republican plot to control the Main Street Americans with fear over a bill created by them that will not be passed in Congress.





Obama supports Net nutrality against the big communication companies who want to control.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L11kLmWha鈥?/a>


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwkwO6Hz2鈥?/a>